John A. SwarbrickArbitrator · Fact-Finder · Workplace Investigator

California attorney · Professional neutral

Independent and impartial analysis of workplace disputes.

I am a California attorney who works exclusively as a neutral. Employers, unions and their counsel retain me to arbitrate labor disputes, to serve as a fact-finder, and to conduct attorney-led workplace investigations whose findings must stand scrutiny — before the parties, an agency, and at any subsequent hearing.

  • Fellow, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
  • Attorney, State Bar of California
  • Barrister, Gray’s Inn, London
  • Solicitor Advocate, England & Wales
  • LL.M. Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine (Straus Institute)
  • LL.M. International Business Law, University of Manchester

For employers, boards and counsel

Workplace Investigations

Independent, attorney-conducted investigations into allegations of harassment, discrimination, retaliation and misconduct — including matters involving executives, elected officials and other senior figures, where internal handling cannot be seen to be neutral, or where the complexity or seriousness of the issues supports retaining an attorney investigator.

  • Scope agreed in writing before the first interview
  • Work normally begins within 1–2 business days of engagement
  • Findings on the preponderance standard, with the evidence weighed in full and the basis for each determination set out
How I conduct investigations

For union and management advocates

Arbitration & Fact-Finding

Grievance and interest arbitration, and statutory fact-finding, for public- and private-sector parties. Listed on the FMCS roster and the California State Mediation and Conciliation Service and Los Angeles County ERCOM panels. Hearings held in person or online.

  • Hearing procedures, fees and cancellation terms published in advance
  • Awards normally issued within 21 days of the record closing
  • Disclosures made before appointment, in writing
Hearing procedures and fees
  • Awards within 21 days of the record closing
  • Hearing dates offered within 1–2 days of appointment
  • Investigations begin within 1–2 business days
  • Fees and cancellation terms published
  • No docketing or administrative fees
John A. Swarbrick

About

Originally from the United Kingdom. At home in California employee and labor relations.

I established John A. Swarbrick Law in December 2023 to work exclusively as a professional neutral, after 35 years working primarily as an advocate in private legal practice and labor relations. I regularly teach arbitration, negotiation and online dispute resolution in the nationally ranked M.A. program in Negotiation, Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding at CSU Dominguez Hills, where I also sit on the Board of Advisors. I have a particular interest in the use of AI in dispute resolution and regularly present on the subject.

Full biography and panel résumé

Why parties select me

I have sat on both sides of the table. I now sit on neither.

Timely and clear awards

Before becoming a professional neutral, I spent a career in private legal practice and labor relations, including eight years as the California State University’s Associate Vice Chancellor for Labor and Employee Relations, where I was chief negotiator for 13 bargaining units and 65,000 represented employees, and for several years headed the systemwide Equal Employment Opportunity and Whistleblower Protection unit. As a heavy user of labor arbitrator services, I understand the real costs of late or ambiguous awards. Having made the transition, I have made it my practice to normally issue awards within 21 days of the record closing and provide a comprehensive analysis as to how I came to each of my determinations. As a former advocate, I understand the process from the attorneys’ perspective. Counsel may not always agree with my determinations, but the award will leave no room for uncertainty as to how, and why, they were reached.

Practiced as an advocate, experienced on both sides of the table

I practiced as both a barrister and solicitor advocate in England and Wales for some 15 years before moving to California. Starting out as a criminal prosecutor, I then moved to the defense side within a broad corporate regulatory practice. I established a national reputation representing police officers in criminal proceedings, serious misconduct cases and public inquiries. I acted as outside counsel for all the national police staff associations: the Chief Police Officers’ Staff Association, the Police Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales, and the Police Federation of England and Wales.

As outside counsel for the National Black Police Association and the Metropolitan Black Police Association, I represented officers and staff as plaintiffs in discrimination proceedings, and represented the MBPA in the Morris Inquiry (the Independent Inquiry into Professional Standards and Employment Matters in the Metropolitan Police Service), a landmark investigation whose report found that the Metropolitan Police’s discipline and complaints processes bore disproportionately on Black and minority ethnic officers and called for radical reform of its personnel procedures.

Having moved to California, I spent the next two decades working with both management and labor clients. My practice involved the negotiation and administration of collective bargaining agreements, and representation as an advocate in grievance, PERB and NLRB processes.

Neutral by profession, not by assignment

I hold an LL.M. in Dispute Resolution from Pepperdine’s Straus Institute and am a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. I adhere to the Code of Professional Responsibility for Arbitrators of Labor-Management Disputes and the AWI Guiding Principles for Workplace Investigations.

Insights

Notes on process, evidence and decision-making

Short, practical pieces for HR leaders, counsel and advocates.

InvestigationsWhy the choice of investigator is itself a legal decision in CaliforniaSeptember 2026
InvestigationsThe use of artificial intelligence in workplace investigationsComing next

Start with a conflict check.

Send the names of the parties and a one-line description of the matter. I will confirm conflicts and availability, usually within one business day, before any confidential detail is shared.